What’s Your Vote on Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients: Yay or Nay?

Table of Contents

With Obama out of office, Republicans are looking to nix the limits his administration imposed on drug testing the unemployed. Instead, they want to make it easier for states to enact drug screening requirements for various forms of public assistance. It’s a move that mainly includes welfare recipients.

Proponents of this movement, which are mainly Republicans, see it as a way to hold them accountable and enforce work-suitable conduct, something they believe would benefit both taxpayers and job-seekers. They also say it’s meant to ensure taxpayers’ money isn’t being wasted on those wanting to use their benefit money on drugs.

Previous Results Have Been Underwhelming

Opponents of the initiative see things differently. They feel this drug testing expansion is unnecessary, costly, and flat-out degrading to those seeking assistance. They also point to existing drug testing programs already implemented by several states which yielded underwhelming results.

At least 15 states currently have legislation on the books regarding drug testing or screening for public assistance applicants or recipients, and they’ve spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to weed out a very small number of drug users.

A great example is Arizona, who promised taxpayers in 2009 that it would save $1.7 million annually by drug testing welfare recipients. That same year, it tested 87,000 applicants and found only one drug abuser. In the state of Missouri during 2014, 446 of their 38,970 welfare applicants were tested – only 48 tested positive. To make matters worse, the budgeted cost for that year’s testing program was $336,297.

The data didn’t improve as time went on. In 2015, a survey of the 10 states that implemented drug testing programs for those seeking assistance, including Mississippi, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, showed they weren’t exactly worth what the taxpayers were paying for them. In fact, these states spent over $850,000 to test welfare recipients and uncovered just 321 positive tests overall. In more than one of these states, not a single substance abuser was discovered through drug testing.

Do Taxpayers Need a New Plan?

There’s already a huge stigma attached to citizens who need the government’s assistance; opponents of the initiative believe that adding an additional drug testing requirement may completely drive away those in need. Ultimately, however, it’s the taxpayers who are funding both the welfare and drug testing programs.

“Very few applicants have tested positive for drug use in states that have implemented these policies,” the Center for Law and Social Policy said in an issue brief last year. “Consequently, operating costs far exceed the fiscal savings from denying benefits.”

So, what do you think? Should welfare recipients undergo drug testing in order to continue receiving benefits? Give us your input and ideas in the comments section below.

Additional Reading: The Financial Toll of Addiction

Image Source: iStock

American Addiction Centers logo
Begin treatment today

The content on DrugAbuse.com is brought to you by American Addiction Centers (AAC), a nationwide network of leading substance abuse and behavioral treatment facilities.

Verify Your Insurance CoverageView Our Treatment Centers

Find a rehab center near you

    Related articles
    american addiction centers photo
    The editorial staff of DrugAbuse.com is comprised of addiction content experts from American Addiction Centers . Our editors and medical reviewers have over a decade of cumulative experience in medical content editing and have reviewed thousands of pages for accuracy and relevance. Our reviewers consistently monitor the latest research from SAMHSA, NIDA, and other reputable sources to provide our readers the most accurate content on the web.